"Now these (the subdued nations) are all Huns, and all bow springer nations unified." (Mao Tun, founder of the Hunnish Empire)

When a historican have to state, that the line of our notions and social development has more to do with Huns than Finnougrians, have to state also, that it is not on racial identity. Doubly so as the designation Hun had very wide sense in the history.

Mao Tun's own words brief the best in the question what really means to be "Hun". There was nothing else required coming from any races and languages, but to admit the Hunnish king as their ruler and fight by his side.

This was never known by the European nations. The many nations merging legal system of Roman Civil Duty with the power of terminating any differences is the most closest to this on a higher cultural level. After the fall of antuque world, among Germans having the same origin and speaking the same language or relative dialects was not so easy to receive "foreigners".  These had to be merged also racially by their descendants taking also the language over. This was the same among the Slavic nations. But the equestrian nomadic specific principle of the plains, what already Mao Tun took was: all submitting free foreigner was considered as Hun, keeping his or her own language, racial difference freely. There is only one condition to obey to the Hunnish ruler and fight by his side.

This was the reason why the horse riding equestrian nations could conquer a gigantic empire so fast, that could never happen to any nations of solid race and language. But this also explains, why these empires couldn't be so permanent and how deep they were at the mercy of the personal abilities and power of the ruler. The tribes were bound by blood on family and stem level only, but the tribes merged without any racial bounds and privity calling themselves once Huns, or Turks or Hungarian.

The basic evidence of our relation to this principleis that a Hungarian of the age of Resettling and Árpád didn't think different to the late dependants of Attila.

"The nation of one origin and race is weak. We have to hol on to the habit of welcoming foreigners, those would join to our case, handling them in honour and respect, teaching them our language and traditions." (King Stephen's Admonition to Prince Emericus)

This apporach was able to teach other tribes mutually, but also to avoid belterjesség and the increasing rate of related typical diseases by genetic refreshments.

Thus can be stated, that anyone who handles the question of differencies another way referring to be Hungarian denies his or her noble forefathers or became too Indoeuropean, that began with the Habsburg rule in Hungary and still exists in the days of great media moguls.

The ideological background was just detailed above. The practical background as the proof of Scythian-Hungarian lineage already referred to, seems rather as gradual expansion, than a continous wandering. This could explain, however having Southern Mongoloid genes, their low rate closes the mongoloid origin of Hungarians, but not the high rate of miscegenation, if they could be in the heart of Asia in the past getting even to the subcontinent India. If and how could they meet to nations with same traditions and language on the way back to South of the Caspian Sea. Finnougrians as we could see, can't be part of this big ethnic family, but we could get in contact with them in the Turanian Basin. The route of our wanderings parallel to the ten Israeli tribes proclaimed to be lost, having very close relation with them from the very beginning on, just as with Romani.


Why Hungarians Can't Be Unified?

In the introduction of the topic was the question already raised, why the characteristic the many Hungarians the many opinions?

To understand this our origin and mentality, including who had and has to be considered as Hungarian, had to be discovered first.

An answer to the question can be seen in the results of our investigations, that ethnic can't be defined as precisely as in case of other European nations being always a mixture of ethnics and cultures from the very ancient times on. Different interests, ideologies, material cultures, tempers, etc. were always basics of Hungarians, and they could live with it under a common ruler, king. On the other hand old Sumerians based their empire on the alliance of quite independent city states and the first try to their unification felt under divine punishment, oppressions, continous rebellions and exile followed by long-long wanderings until our place was finally find, where sadly oppressions and rebellions continued later.

Common explanation of the confusion of the languages is that God gave different language to different people (the Bible accounts the origin of seventy nations from here, so the origin of seventy languages possibly). But no different languages necessary to not to understand each other and scatter. It is enough to have the same language, but having and hanging on by the skin of one's teeth to different ideas of the goal and it's construction.

Hungarians in their actual state have to decide dramatic changes, based on changes of approach to be open to new-old things. Hungarians have to wake up and recognize that their fathers were not necessarily as primitive and bad as it was given told by other nations those acceptance they have been longing for to believe. Their recognition again would give the excitement of new things giving basis to find themselves again.

Nevertheless there are old things to be forgotten to give their places to new things being initiaters of a chain of events those will let them freed up from their actual pathetic situation and getting back credit of other nations. Hungarians have to accept themselves as key to acceptance of others. They should not fight themselves any longer, but discover their real past again, that merges with Jewry better than the history of any other European nation, that is besides historical works and the religios beliefs now also  proven by genetics. Returning to the old knowledge taken from their old craddles of civilization. Returning to the glorious traditions based on acceptance and understanding, and the faith in the Only God, those integrated and gave them power in a foreign world as they could do it even today to stay, augment and become a monument factor on the stage of Europe.

Summary

There is still much more to study in depth concerning real origin of Hungarians. As it was said in the preliminary remarks to this essay, here we have presented some hints that may be either confirmed or not by further research and discussion.

We are aware that the hypotheses proposed here are not conventional, however, they are founded on historical facts and taking account of research already done by many scholars, most of them Hungarian (Baráth Tibor, Bíró Lajos, Dümmerth Dezső, Gyárfás István, Györffy György, Hámori Alfred, Kiszely István, Lépő Zoltán, Magyar Adorján, Mészáros Gyula, to mention some of them).

Anyhow, strange parallels can be identified by the analysis of Near East and Central Asian traditions, especially with Judaistic ones including the two Settlements, where based on amount of them these can be not coincidence, otherwise an ugly game of fate.

The purpose of this essay is to contribute with the study of the origins by suggesting that among the ancient documents the key to solve the mystery of the origins may be hidden and waiting to be discovered.